View More
View More
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed are of those of the members of Group 8 and are not
representative of University of Southampton or National Oceanography Centre.
View More
Back to Tamar Sampling
INTRODUCTION
On the 5th of July, part of the group was deployed on the Falcon Spirit in the lower
part of the Tamar estuary; where experiments into temperature, salinity, chlorophyll,
and various nutrients were conducted. These were carried out at 7 different sites
at different parts of the lower estuary, and so together with the RIB data can allow
inferences about overall processes in the Tamar estuary.
AIMS
Armed with a Rosette CTD and Niskin bottles, the aim of the Falcon Spirit study was:
to gather data regarding variations in the vertical profiles of chemical properties
such as temperature and salinity; to study the nutrient concentrations of the river
and their spatial variation along the estuary; and to gather information about plankton
species, specifically abundances and diversities of the lower Tamar.
METHODOLOGY
Due to a battery failure of the CTD and firing failures, only 7 horizontal transects
were conducted sampled, via horizontal transects, across the river mouth (Lynher),
St John’s Lake SSSI and the Sound. As a consequence, dissolved oxygen samples and
phytoplankton samples were unable to be obtained, other than at station 1 (C-1).
At each station; the T/S probe on the CTD was functioning and used to sample vertical
profiles of temperature, salinity and depth throughout the lower regions of the estuary.
Surface chlorophyll samples were taken via the vessel’s underway pumping system and
processed using the same method as on the RIB’s (see RIB methodology).
TEMPERATURE & SALINITY PROFILES:
CTD T/S profiles overall illustrate that the Tamar was well mixed in terms of temperature
and salinity on the 05/07/2019. The temperature of the surface waters slightly decreases
as one heads down the river; starting at 18.3°c and finishing at 17.0°c. This is
due to greater mixing of colder sea water towards the mouth of the estuary. The vertical
profile of temperature also changes between the stations as you head seawards, with
high variability in the shape of these vertical profiles although in general greater
stratification in the upper stations. For example; the first station shows a shallow
thermocline at approximately 2m, whereas station 6 has a thermocline at 10m and station
7 shows a near linear decrease in temperature with depth.With regards to salinity,
this increases as one travels downstream as the water column mixes with saline ocean
water. However, the upper estuary stations have a more consistent water column in
terms of salinity at around 32.8 PSU; only slightly increasing with depth. Whereas
the last station features a halocline around 4m and also a greater range from 34.5-35.0
PSU.
ADCP
At 15 different sites (7 stations, 7 transects and the harbour area), an ADCP was
run which gives a clear indication of any stratification and the flow velocity of
the estuaries water column. These show a well-mixed column towards the harbour (Fig.30)
and generally more variation as you head up the estuary. Some stations such as stations
28 (Fig.33), show very clear stratification between a fast flowing upper layer and
slower bottom; which in this case is likely caused by the nearby confluence of the
rivers Tamar and Tavy increasing turbulence and resulting in increased velocity.
Other stations show inputs to the surveyed area, shown by a band of increased flow
in one vertical section of the track; clearly seen in the right of station 29 (Fig.35).
Whilst some feature possible fronts of cold water moving much slower, such as transect
5 (Fig.40); these could be due to a close proximately to shore and possible slowed-flow/backflow.
Figure 30: ADCP image of profile of the Habour
Figure 31: ADCP image of profile of Station 27
Figure 32: ADCP imagae of profile of transect 1
Figure 33: ADCP image of profile of Station 28
Figure 34: ADCP image of profile of transect 2
Figure 35: ADCP image of profile of station 29
Figure 36:ADCP image of profile of transect 3
Figure 37: ADCP image of profile of station 30
Figure 38: ADCP image of profile of transect 4
Figure 39: ADCP image of profile of station 31
Figure 40: ADCP image of profile of transect 5
Figure 41: ADCP image of profile of station 32
Figure 42: ADCP image of profile of Transect 6
Figure 43: ADCP image of profile of station 33
Figure 44: ADCP image of profile of transect 7