Introduction
On 4th July 2017 between 12:00 UTC – 16:00 UTC we took measurements half hourly from the pontoon near King Harry Ferry. Taking vertical measurements from a set location allowed us to investigate how changing physical conditions, specifically temperature and flow speed at different depths throughout the tidal cycle, influenced factors such as chlorophyll concentration, which can be used as an approximation for phytoplankton abundance.
Our aim was to observe part of a coastal ocean system, in this case the influence of tidal range on stratification, light and nutrient concentration on a stationary point in the river Fal over a set period of time.
Map 1. Map displaying the location of the pontoon in the Fal estuary used for data collection on 04/07/2017.
Discussion
With King Harry Ferry’s pontoon located relatively close to the mouth of the estuary,
tide has a significant influence on most water properties. High tide at the day of
the measurements was at 14:00 UTC, and just before and during that time the nutrient
concentrations change significantly (Fig. 1). The decrease in temperature and increase
of salinity, dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll suggest a single, tidal-
The salinity measurements suggest a slower high-
The change in direction likely causes mixing areas throughout the river, especially after high tide at 14:35 UTC, just as the vertical increase of turbidity shows (Fig. 1). The increase in light attenuation at 14:32 UTC (Fig. 3) would support this theory, since the cloud cover was mostly consistent at the day measurements were taken. Instead, the cause for reduced surface light levels is probably a temporary increase in free particles in the water column.
The isolated pH increase at 4m/13:00, which seems to be correlated with turbidity increase (Fig. 1), likely has a temporary source of anthropogenic pollution, e.g. a mining leakage or a passing boat or vessel disposing of their sewage.
Figure 1 also shows higher phytoplankton abundance during high tide via chlorophyll
measuring, suggesting the tidal wave swept in a number of organisms. However, comparing
the chlorophyll concentration taken with the probe to the chlorophyll measured in
the water samples shows different results for the same depth and time (Fig. 4). Plotted
against each other it becomes apparent that there is no pattern in the value difference
of both chlorophyll measurements (Fig. 5), meaning that the Exo-
Method
Light meter (left)
Sensor is lowered into the water column once per hour, with irradiance each time measured first on the pontoon and then each meter in the water. Light attenuation can be determined by ratio of surface to depth irradiance.
Exo-
The probe is lowered every half hour into the water column, where it takes a variety of measurements such as temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen every meter. It is connected to a digital display (right) on the pontoon.
Niskin bottle (front)
Deployed meter by meter and closed at 1 m and 4 m depth each to take water samples. From both samples, 3 x 50 ml are syringed through filters, which then are placed in acetone and cooled over night. Fluorescence analysis later will determine chlorophyll concentration.
Flow meter (back)
The device is lowered into the water column once per hour, measuring flow by rate of impellor’s rotation caused by water movement in meters per second, and flow direction in degrees every meter.
Results
There were changes in temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll concentration
from 13:00/13:30 UTC until 14:30 UTC, and another concentration change around 14:30
UTC, particularly at surface levels ≤ 2 m depth. Salinity concentration increases
with depth to a time-
Flow direction changed from 292°-
Date |
04/07/2017 |
Pontoon Location |
50o 12’958N 005o 01’671W. |
High water UTC |
13:58 |
Low water UTC |
07:47 |
Time at pontoon UTC |
11:50 |
Time out of dock (Winnie the Pooh) UTC |
12:30 |
Time left Pontoon UTC |
16:30 |
Weather |
60 - Light wind (<1 knot) Flat water |
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed are solely those of the contributors, they do not reflect the views and opinions of the University of Southampton.
Limitations
Every device was lowered into the water column by hand, the only indicator for depth
being marks every meter on the rope the devices were connected to (except for the
exo-
Table 1. Table displaying the environmental conditions and times (UTC) of data collection within the estuary.
Fig. 1 Depth profiles of nutrients once every half hour over a four-
Fig. 2 Depth profiles of water flow speed and direction once every hour over a
four-
Fig. 2 Depth profiles of water flow speed and direction once every hour over a
four-
Fig. 4 Comparison of measured chlorophyll concentrations over time at 1 m and
4 m depth each, with the half-
Fig. 5 Chlorophyll concentrations plotted against each other for calibration.
No trend suggests the chlorophyll measurements from the Exo-
PONTOON
Falmouth 2017 -
Introduction |
Chemistry |
Physics |
Biology |
Introduction |
Physics |
Biology |
Chemistry |
Introduction |
Poster |
Video Clips |