Group 4
Back -
David Mans, Suzi Buchan, Mike Brewer, Crystal Szczerbicka, Simon du Boulay,
Robert Lancaster
Front - Eleonora Manca, Luke Aki
Contents
The River Tamar and Plymouth Sound was the subject of a multidisciplinary study into the biology, physics and chemistry of the area. The River Tamar extends for some 31km and has a catchment area of 1700 km2 (Evans et al. 1993). The Tamar is a partially mixed macrotidal estuary and can be classed as a Ria. Four separate days were spent surveying the upper, lower and offshore parts of the estuary. One of these days consisted of a geophysical survey of the mid-part of the estuary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 1 - Map showing locations of sampling.
Back to Top
References:
Evans K.M., Fileman T.W., Ahelm, M., Mantoura, R., and Cummings, D., 1993, Fate of organic micropollutants in estuaries (triazine herbicides and alkyl phenol polyethoxylates). National Rivers Authority.
Geophysical Survey of
the Lower Tamar Estuary
An area of the River Tamar, extending from the
Three transects were selected; 1) centred
on the
In order to
calibrate the instruments, a Van Veen grab was used to take a sediment sample at
grid square 565441. This was compared to the image produced by the side-scan
sonar to confirm the sediment types. A fine mud was brought up by the grab
producing a light side-scan sonar image. Therefore, darker images indicated
coarser sediment types such as gravels and bed rock; lighter images indicate
silts and very fine muds.
Back to Geophysics
Contents
1.2 Transect and Tidal Information
1.2.1 Tidal Information
1.2.2 Transect
information
1.3 Analysis of the geophysics surveys
The
printouts were analysed and the major features were recorded and measured.
Isometric plots were produced using the position data acquired from the ships
GPS. The regions of major features such as exposed bedrock, sand ripples or (man-made)
bridge supports were then noted. 1.3.1
Area surrounding Royal
On
the first transect, between 58000 and 59000 Northings, and from 243200 to
243600 Eastings, bifurcated bedforms (megaripples) were identified, which
extended for a length of 54m. These appeared to show a wave-dominated system,
as opposed to a tidally-dominated system. On the eastern side, the average
wavelengths of these features were 9m, which compared to 18m on the western
side, possibly due to less wave-dominated energy on the eastern side. This
difference in energy between these two banks could explain also why the
sediment is coarser on the eastern side, where the bedforms have a shorter
wavelength and are finer-grained than on the western side.
Between
58600 and 58800 Northings, bridge supports showed up on the side-scan sonar. On
either side of these supports there were no sand waves apparent, due to
turbulence and eddies that are induced by contact of the supports with tidal
currents. Behind the eastern bridge
support the bedrock is evidently more exposed than elsewhere. This bedrock is covered
with fine sediment on either side of the western bridge support. On this
bedrock there is evidence of anthropogenic activity, as illustrated by the
construction of bridge supports and piers. Further south, between 58200 and 58400 Northings, there is further evidence of anthropogenic activity in the form of mooring lines that extend for a length of 630 m. Associated with these mooring lines is a zone of sediment striping, which could indicate dredging activity.
|
|
Figure 2 - Side scan print out of the dock wall. |
|
||
Figure 3 : A chart showing the location of the 1st transects. |
Figure 4 : An isometric plot of the area centred around Royal Albert Bridge. |
Figure 5 : A sidescan print out of Royal Albert Bridge. |
1.3.2
The second transect was between 55600 and 56400 Northings, and 243800 and 244600
Eastings. This revealed a scour mark, possibly due to the intersection of the
River Tamar and the River Lynher, between 55600 and 55800 Northings.
The
only other point of interest is an area of faint dredge marks, observed between
56200 and 56000 Northings. Otherwise, the bed is uniform in terms of sediment
type, with no further evidence of bedforms or anthropogenic activity.
1.3.3
Southern Dock Wall
The third and final transect was used to test the effectiveness of the
side-scan sonar at detecting different materials used in the construction of the
docks. The transect lies between 54000 and 55000 Northings and 244600 and 245000
Eastings. This area is located near the Southern Dock wall. The resulting plot
enables some differentiation between a solid concrete wall and a wooden
supported wall. On the side-scan sonar printout there is evidence of side swipe,
which indicates reverberation from a thick concrete structure, this gives off
several reflections of the sound pulse.
|
||
Figure 6 : A chart showing the section of Dock Wall surveyed. |
Figure 7 : A sonograph print identifying a scour mark. |
Figure 8 : A picture showing the grab sample. |
From the surveys it is evident that this form of data is not of sufficient detail to make firm conclusions about dock wall construction. However we have shown that it may be useful for identifying areas where further investigation would be beneficial using other means such as divers. It has also been shown that the side scan sonar is more suited to identifying larger bedforms and sediment types on a river or seabed.
1.3.4 Grab results
The grab was taken at 50º 23'052N, 4º 11'162W, and confirmed the sediment type predicted from the
print out. The sediment consisted of fine material with a thin surface
oxic layer. The grab also contained a number of angular rocks.
A number of problems were experienced while taking the transects:
1.1.4 References
www.tamarvalley.org.uk
www.tamarvalleytourism.co.uk
www.tamarbridge.org.uk
Jones, G.E. & Glegg, G.E., 2004, Effective use of geophysical sensors for marine environmental assessment and habitat mapping, WIT Press, www.witpress.com
|
||
2.1 Introduction 2.2 Position Data 2.5 References |
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
R.V Bill Conway |
Aim - The aim of this research was to observe how the Tamar estuary acts as an interface between low salinity river water and high salinity sea water together with its effect on the chemistry of the estuary.
Results are presented from a survey carried out on the RV Bill Conway on
the 29th
June 2004
. The purpose
of the study was to examine the biological, chemical and physical characteristics of the Tamar
Estuary to
determine if
the typical profile expected of riverine estuaries of this kind is
evident. The focus was on the expected conservative behaviour of major nutrients and aquatic
components of estuaries (chlorophyll, nitrates, silicates, oxygen and
phosphates). The
research was carried out with the use of an (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler
(ADCP) and CTD with rosette bottles
attached. Samples were taken at the
surface, mid-depth and at the base of the water column, at selected sites.
The survey took place between 50°24’225, 4°12’290 (just north of
Ernesettle Pier) and 50°20’500, 4°10’160 (
The study was carried moving downriver against an incoming tide. The 11 sites were
selected for sampling and study, as the result of being either at a
confluence of rivers or at a point where flow would be definitive of flow
patterns occurring within a chosen transect. The flow patterns at these
transects were mapped using an ADCP. Where surface evidence of water column
stratification was present along a transect a CTD was cast and water sample
collections were undertaken. Two horizontal plankton net samples, with a mesh
size of 200µm, were also taken during
the course of the survey, one in the upper part of the survey and one out to sea,
near the breakwater.
Chart 1 - Position of the 11 stations visited on the Bill Conway.
2.2 Position Data + Tidal data
2.2.1 Tide Information
2.2.2 ADCP Data
2.2.3 CTD Data
2.2.4 Plankton
2.3 Analysis
2.3.1
ADCP
2.3.2 CTD
2.3.3 Nutrients
2.3.4 Oxygen
2.3.5 Chlorophyll
2.3.5 Zooplankton
2.3.1
ADCP
Data
At
the confluence of the River Lynher and Tamar, three transects were taken using the
ADCP. The transects were taken on a
flood tide. It was found that river water flowed outwards along the northern edge
of the River Lynher, whereas the sea water was found along the southern deeper
side. Furthermore, a large amount of
backscatter (Tattersall et al, 2003) was observed where the two water bodies met.
This backscatter was indicative of turbulent mixing (Figure 9).
Figure 9 - Velocity of water travelling in an easterly direction across the River Lynher. |
The flood tide observed entering the River Tamar behaved in
the expected manner, in terms of an evident northward flow, with the denser seawater moving
below the lighter freshwater (except that it had been pushed eastwards by the
freshwater flow from the River Lynher) (Uncles & Lewis, 2001).
Figure 10 - Velocity of water travelling in an easterly direction from West Mud Buoy to Plymouth Docks. |
The likely cause of the eddy is the presence of the dock walls
north of the
narrows. The dock walls divert the
flow into Saint Johns Lake, where the area is sufficiently large
enough to allow the eddy to form. This eddying presents itself in the ADCP
record as a series of directional switches in direction of flow (Figure 11),
further evidence is seen in the backscatter data.
Figure 11 - A graph of flow direction and magnitude illustrating the eddying around West Mud Buoy. |
The CTD casts identified four datasets of interest.
Figure 12 - Chart showing Locations of ADCP. |
Figure 13 - Chart showing location of CTD dip at West Mud Buoy. |
The transmittance at all four CTD casts remains relatively uniform throughout the
water column. The only difference is
in the relative amounts where there’s higher transmittance near site 10 due to
deeper water and less turbulent mixing.
Sites 5 and 6 showed marked increases in fluorescence at depths of 2 metres and 4 metres respectively. Conversely, site 10 showed the same increase, however, it occurred at a depth of 8 to 10 metres due to reduced light attenuation.
As CTD measurements were taken, the secchi disk depth was recorded.
Silicate-
The
silicate mixing diagram, (Figure 14) illustrates silicate
concentration change between the riverine and marine end members.
The mixing diagram suggests that the behaviour of Silicate in the
Tamar Estuary is non-conservative, with greatest removal occurring in the
upper reaches of the estuary, to the north of the River Tavy.
This pattern is likely to be the result of an increase in diatom
abundance and the extraction of Silicate from the water column for the synthesis of their
tests. This is supported by phytoplankton counts (chla_and_phytoplanktoncounts.xls) showing
diatoms dominate the phytoplankton community. Phosphate-
Phosphate decreases with an increase in
salinity. Figure 16 illustrates that
phosphate displays non-conservative behaviour throughout the estuary
transect.
However, between salinities of 0-20 there is significant removal of
phosphate, whereas between 20 and 35 there is a clear addition of
silicate. These behaviours might be explained by biological depletion of
phosphate by phytoplankton populations, and the anthropogenic addition from
the built-up areas of the lower estuary. Nitrate- Nitrate concentrations show a continuous non-conservative profile throughout the upper and lower estuary (Figure 15). This is due, again, to removal of nitrates from the water column by phytoplankton activity. There is no evidence for any anthropogenic addition similar to that found in the phosphate profile.
|
|
Figure 14 - Silicate against salinity showing TDL. | |
Figure 15 - Nitrate against salinity showing TDL. |
Figure 16 - Phosphate against salinity showing TDL. | Figure 17 - Dissolved oxygen against salinity. |
2.3.4
Dissolved
oxygen
Water was collected from
the CTD casts in order to measure dissolved oxygen using the
Winkler method, and a value for oxygen concentration (µmol/l) was calculated.
Oxygen concentration was plotted against salinity (Figure 17) to reveal any
pattern between the riverine and marine end-members. The overall trend
is an increase in oxygen concentration with increasing salinity. This general trend is explained by lower summer water
temperatures in the marine compared to fresh waters, leading to a higher
dissolution capacity in oceanic waters. The potential increased
summer productivity of marine phytoplankton populations, which is supported by
higher phytoplankton counts towards the marine end-member
(chla_and_phytoplankton_counts.xls).
Horizontal trawls (200um mesh net) were taken for zooplankton samples at stations 6 and 11, to complement samples taken further up the estuary by rib. Analysis of samples by another group was not carried out, and so data was not made available for interpretation. It might be expected, however, that as general statements
a) zooplankton abundance might increase towards the mouth of the estuary
b) Both meso- and holozooplankton diversity will increase towards the mouth of the estuary.
c) The dominance of the zooplankton community by particular groups, particularly hyperbenthic species, will increase higher up the estuary.
The physical profiles made of the water column (with ADCP and CTD) revealed various processes: a flood tide entering the river Tamar via a northward flow, with the denser seawater moving below the lighter freshwater (presence of salt wedge), as well as strong thermocline and halocline at 5 m depth up the River Lynher, which decrease in strength and depth moving out towards Plymouth Sound due to turbulence and mixing.
Overall biological removal of silicate, phosphate and nitrate is apparent towards the marine end-member however this is neither reflected by chl a levels nor strongly backed up by phytoplankton counts, although a dominance of diatoms may explain silicate concentrations. There is evidence of anthropogenic input of phosphates between 20 and 35 psu.
Dissolved oxygen levels are higher towards the marine-end member suggesting high phytoplankton production, this is supported by high phytoplankton counts at higher salinities. High dissolved oxygen levels could also be put down to lower marine water temperatures.
2.5 References
Uncles, R.J., Lewis, R.E, 2001, The transport of freshwater from river to coastal zone through a temperate estuary, Journal of Sea Research, p.173.
G.R. Tattersall, A.J. Elliott and N.M. Lynn, 2004, Suspended sediment
concentrations in the Tamar Estuary, www.sciencedirect.com
Back to Top
3.1 Introduction 3.2 Position Data 3.4 Biological Analysis 3.6 Conclusion |
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
R.V Terschelling |
3.1 Introduction
Results are
presented from a survey of coastal estuarine water from the lower Tamar estuary.
Previous studies in the area around
Chart 2 - Sampling stations for Terschelling.
3.2 Position Data
3.2.1 Tidal Information
3.2.2 Position and Deployment Data
3.3 Physical
Analysis
3.3.1 CTD Data
From CTD
and ADCP analysis a series of deductions are possible about the water of
Plymouth Sound. The riverine water rounds the eastern coast of
A band of
freshwater was found to be flowing South along the western edge of Cawsand bay
which is illustrated by data from station 5 (Figure 20).
The layer of freshwater is at a depth of 2m, where there is reduction in
salinity and an increase in temperature. The more saline seawater layer can be
seen below the thermocline at 5.5m, establishing a stratified water body, with a
Figure 19 - Temperature Salinity Profile of Station 1 | Figure 20 - Temperature Salinity Profile of Station 5 |
As
water bends around the headland at Penlee Point (50 19 153N 4 11 202W) it meets
the denser seawater and is pushed up and over it, forming a thermohalocline
which is pushed into the Sound with the flood tide, as seen at station 7 (Figure
21). This pattern is inherently very stable, with a
Figure 21 - Temperature Salinity Profile of Station 7 | Figure 22 - Temperature Salinity Profile of Station 9 |
3.4
Biological Analysis
3.4.1 Zooplankton community structure Table 4 shows the results of zooplankton identification from the bottle samples. Vertical net samples were taken at depths dependent on the back scatter shown on the ADCP (chlorophyll maxima) and the structural data identified by the CTD. Station 2 shows that there is greater diversity and abundance of zooplankton at depth compared to the surface layer. By contrast at station 3 there is similar total abundance in both upper and lower samples. There is, however, a change in species type. The lower sample was taken within the thermocline and demonstrated a large abundance of gastropods compared to 0 in the upper sample. The thermocline at station 4 was present at a depth of 6m and there was a greater abundance of zooplankton (6088 individuals per m3) above the thermocline compared to the sample taken below and through the thermocline (1796 individuals per m3). It was also clear that different species were present at the different depths with reference to the physical structure of the water column. Again at station 5 the size of the populations in the surface 4 metres was greater than 4-8 metres. The surface layer was dominated by Noctiluca sp. Although the depth sample had fewer individuals there was greater diversity. The CTD profile of station 5 has shown the surface 4 metres of water to be fresher and warmer than the water the lower sample was taken in. It is clear that different species groups occupy different biological niches above and below the thermocline.
|
|
Figure 23 - Decapod larvae | |
Figure 24 - Copepod, Polycheate, Hydromedusae. | |
Figure 25 - Decapod |
3.5
Chemical Analysis
3.5.1 Oxygen
3.5.3 Nutrients
3.5.4 Chlorophyll a
3.5.1 Dissolved Oxygen
Dissolved oxygen data showed no consistent pattern when plotted against salinity. When plotted against depth the general trend within the data was a decrease in oxygen concentration with depth. Station 5 illustrates the typical dissolved oxygen profile found. This trend can be explained by surface wave activity increasing dissolved oxygen content at the surface and by zooplankton using dissolved oxygen for respiration at the surface of the water column. Large populations of zooplankton are not found in areas where there are low levels of dissolved oxygen. The rough sea on the day of survey is therefore the most likely cause of high dissolved oxygen levels in the surface 3 meters of water.
As the water masses surveyed were influenced by fresh water, nutrient concentration is plotted against salinity to produce horizontal mixing diagrams. Phosphate showed no consistent pattern when plotted against salinity and depth suggesting that for the sites investigated phosphate is well mixed horizontally and vertically. Silicate did show some variation in concentration (Figure 27). The concentration profile is non-conservative due to the removal of silicate. This removal is probably associated with the action of diatoms, which use silica to synthesise their skeletal tests. There is little vertical stratification for silica except at station 3, where most removal occurs at a depth of 10m (Figure 28). This removal is probably due to diatom growth at depth, where the maximum extent of the euphotic zone is at its deepest being 6 metres (Table 4).
Nitrate shows non-conservative behaviour with some addition to the water column further out to sea (Figure 26). Fresh water run off in the area is the most likely source of this nitrate. |
|
Figure 26 - Nitrate TDL |
Figure 27 - Silicate Theoretical Dilution Line | Figure 28 - Silicate profile at station 3 |
The CTD profile of station 1 (Western Edge) indicated the water column is well mixed (Figure 19), with nutrients dispersed evenly throughout the water column. NO3 and PO4 remain essentially constant with depth (small changes of ~0.2 μM), suggesting it is depth penetration of light and the physical structure of the water column that primarily determines the position of phytoplankton in the water column. There is a decrease in the measured Chl a concentration of ~0.6 μg/L between the surface and 6m. This is unusual, as the concentration measured at 13m is close to that measured at the surface, and could indicate the effect of a physical process in the water column (Figure 29). The Chl a and nutrient measurements illustrated in Figure 30 for station 5 are more typical of a stratified water column with a thermo-/halocline present at approximately 4m, as illustrated by the CTD analysis (Figure 20). Both PO4 and NO3 decrease with an increase in Chl a concentration between the surface and the thermo-/halocline, suggesting utilisation by phytoplankton. This is followed by an increase in PO4 as the demand for this nutrient drops. It can only be presumed that the NO3 concentration would also eventually increase at depth as they are regenerated from phytoplankton in overlying water and from resuspension of bottom sediments.
Figure 29 - Profiles of chlorophyll at station 1 | Figure 30 - Profiles at station 5 |
The physical data identified a well mixed area located in Plymouth Sound and more stratification further out to sea. As the tide floods into the Plymouth Sound there is some superimposition of this off shore stratification. A layer of fresh water was also identified in the water column.
Zooplankton data showed that different species occupy different biological nieces above and below the thermocline.
Dissolved oxygen results showed a decrease in levels with depth as a result of wave action.
Nitrate data shows addition offshore due to freshwater inputs and silica shows removal due to diatoms.
The chlorophyll results for station 1 are atypical a decrease in chlorophyll levels down to 6 m but by 13m the levels returned to surface concentrations. Station 5 however did show a typical chlorophyll profile.
3.7 References
Morris, A.W., Howland, R.J.M., Woodward, E.M.S, Bale A.J., and Mantoura, R.F.C,
2003, Nitrite and ammonia in the Tamar estuary, www.sciencedirect.com
Holligan, P.M, Williams, P.M, Purdie, D., and Harris, R.P, 1984, Photosynthesis,
respiration and nitrogen supply of plankton populations in stratified, frontal
and tidally mixed shelf waters, Marine Ecology Progress Series.
Back to Top
Small Boat Work (Upper Estuary) | |
4.1 Introduction 4.3 Analysis |
|
R.V Ocean Adventure |
4.1 Introduction
The focus of the RIB survey was the biology of the upper
reaches of the river Tamar; collecting zooplankton, phytoplankton, chlorophyll a
and nutrients, as well as dissolved oxygen, salinity, temperature and depth
readings. Samples were aimed to be taken at a fixed salinity interval of 2,
and depth profiles were planned, to obtain an idea of the physical structure of
the water column. Unfortunately, the survey was cut short due to technical
failures on both RIBs, we shall therefore present the data obtained between 4
and 22.
4.2.1 Tidal Information
4.2.2 Position and Sampling Data
4.3.1 Nutrients Phosphates |
|
Figure 31 - Nitrate vs Salinity showing the TDL. |
Silicate concentration clearly decreases
with increasing salinity and displays non-conservative mixing (Figure 33). There
is clear removal of silicate which could be linked to diatom populations
developing, and less anthropogenic addition of silicates which would potentially
balance this biological removal out.
Figure 32 - Phosphate against salinity. | Figure 33 - Silicate vs Salinity showing the TDL. |
4.3.2 Dissolved Oxygen
Generally dissolved oxygen increases with salinity (Figure 34), this could be down to the influence of colder oceanic waters which have a higher dissolution capacity compared to the warmer fresh waters, and possibly also due to increased activity of marine phytoplankton which develop towards higher salinities, but as this is not reflected in the chlorophyll a data, it is likely the dissolved oxygen pattern is linked to physical processes rather than biological ones.
Figure 34 - Dissolved oxygen against salinity. | Figure 35 - Chlorophyll a against salinity. |
4.3.3 Chlorophyll a
The overall trend is a decrease in
chlorophyll a (chl a) with increasing
salinities, which suggests that there is a strong development of phytoplankton
species which are better adapted to less saline waters and hence different from
marine species which would develop in much stronger salinities > 30, it is
therefore possible that chlorophyll levels increase towards stronger salinities,
however we have no data available to draw any such conclusions (Figure 5).
4.3.4 Zooplankton
Unfortunately, zooplankton samples were unable to be collected and analysed for the area covered by the small boat work. This was due to failures with both boats, resulting in termination of the sampling.
Appendix 1 Geophysical Survey (Nat West II)
26/06/04 - High Water - 11:22 GMT Low Water - 17:33 GMT Neap tides
Area | Transect | Position Started | Position Finished | Notes |
Bridge | 1 | 50º 24.54 N 04º 12.21 W |
50º 24.13 N 04º 12.22W |
|
Docks | 2 | 50º 23.49 N 04º 12.48 W |
50º 23.31 N 03º 11.98 W |
Appendix 2 Lower estuary sampling (Bill Conway)
2.2.1
Tidal
Information
29/06/04 - High Water - 14:42 GMT Low Water -
08:32 3 days after neaps tides.
Station |
Start Position |
|
Finish Position |
|
Notes |
Data Files (linked) |
1 |
50º 26 209 N |
04º 11.886 W |
50º 26 239 |
4º 11 761 |
|
GP4000R |
2 |
50º 24 495 N |
04º 12.300 W |
50º 24 478 |
4º 12 091 |
|
GP4001R |
3 |
50º 24 433 N |
04º 12.337 W |
50º 24 418 |
4º 12 128 |
|
GP4002R |
4 |
50º 23 990 N |
04º12.350 W |
50º 23 982 |
4º 12 622 |
River Convergence (Tamar) |
GP4004R |
5 |
50º 23 962 N |
04º 12.640 W |
50º 23 597 |
4º 12 672 |
River Convergence (Lynher) |
GP4005R |
6 |
50º 23 612 N |
04º 12.615 W |
50º 23 810 |
4º 12 285 |
River Convergence (Mixed) |
GP4006R |
7 |
50º 22 004 N |
04º 11.119 W |
50º 21 654 |
4º 11 471 |
|
GP4007R |
8 |
50º 21 630 N |
04º 10.057 W |
50º 21 532 |
4º 10 244 |
The |
GP4008R |
9 |
50º 20 577 N |
04º 09 |
50º 20 587 |
4º 07 760 |
Across Sound |
GP4009R |
10 |
50º 20 565 N |
04º 07 767 W |
50º 20 053 |
4º 08 165 |
|
GP4010R |
11 |
50º 20 154 N |
04º 09 395 W |
50º 20 500 |
4º 10 160 |
|
GP4011R |
Table 1 : ADCP data and file names for the lower estuary.
Back to Lower Estuary Analysis
Cast |
Position |
|
Bottles Fired |
Notes |
Secchi Depth (m) |
Data Files (linked) |
1 |
50º 24.225 N |
04º 12.290 W |
N/A |
|
N/A |
GRP4ST1.RAW |
2 |
50º 26.248 N |
04º 11.934 W |
1@3m , 1@Surface |
|
1.08 |
GRP4ST2.RAW |
3 |
50º 24.540 N |
04º 12.284 W |
N/A |
Bridge, outfall pipe on west bank |
1.19 |
GRP4ST3.RAW |
5 |
50º 23.712 N |
04º 12.358 W |
1@10m, 1@5m, 1@Surface |
|
2.10 |
GRP4ST5.RAW |
6 |
50º 23.607 N |
04º 13.371 W |
1@6m, 1@3m, 2@Surface |
Front/ line, 1 surface bottle didn't fire. |
1.75 |
GRP4ST6.RAW |
7 |
50º 21.759 N |
04º 11.419 W |
1@18.5, 1@10.2, 1@Surface |
|
3.15 |
GRP4ST7.RAW |
8 |
50º 21.561 N |
04º 10.140 W |
N/A |
|
N/A |
GRP4ST8.RAW |
10 |
50º 20.072 N |
04º 08.063 W |
1@13m, 1@6, 1@Surface |
Secchi depth with filters Green 1.89 m, Red 2.01m, Blue 2.94m, |
N/A |
GRP4STX.RAW |
11 |
50º 20.308 N |
04º 09.863 W |
1@13m, 1@7.5, 1@Surface |
Secchi depth with filters Green 3.03 m, Red 2.25m, Blue 2.16m, |
N/A |
GRP4ST11.RAW |
Table 2 : CTD data and file names for the lower estuary.
Back to Lower Estuary Analysis
2.2.3 Plankton Net
Trawl |
Position Started |
|
Position Finished |
|
Time in Water |
Boat Speed (knots) |
Mesh size (µm) |
Tide (knots) |
1 |
50º 23.743 N |
04º 12.497 W |
50º 23 723 N |
04º 12 406 W |
3 minutes |
1.2 |
200 |
0.8 |
2 |
50º 20.432 N |
04º 09.629 W |
50º 20 541 N |
04º 09 604 W |
3 minutes 5 seconds |
1.8 |
200 |
0.2 |
Table 3. Plankton net data for the lower estuary.
Back to Lower Estuary Analysis
Appendix 3 Offshore sampling (Terschelling)
3.2.1 Tidal Information
03/07/04 - High Water - 06:10 GMT and 18:30 GMT Low Water -
12:26 GMT
1 day before spring tides.
Back to Offshore Analysis
3.2.2 Position and Deployment data
Station No. |
Position |
Time (GMT) |
Depth FF/ADCP |
Secchi Depth |
Bottles |
Nets |
CTD\File |
1 |
50º 20.138 N 04º 09.934 W |
08:.58 |
16.3m/15.3m |
N/A |
1@13m, 1@7m, 1@Surface. |
N/A |
GRP4ST1D |
2 |
50º 19.366 N 04º 10.987 W |
09:20 |
17.5m/16m |
5m |
1@13m, 1@5m, 1@Surface. |
15m-5m 5m-0m |
GRP4ST2D |
3 |
50º 18.172 N |
10:14 |
32.2m/29.8m |
6m |
1@26m, 1@20m, 1@10m, 1@Surface. |
23m-13m 10m-0m |
GRP4ST3D |
4 |
50º 19.409 N 04º 14.201 W |
11:01 |
14.2m/13.2m |
4m |
1@12m, 1@10m, 1@5m, 1@Surface. |
8m-4m 4m-0m |
GRP4ST4D |
5 |
50º 19.841 N 04º 11.210 W |
11:57 |
11.5m/9.9m |
5m |
1@9m, 1@6m, 1@Surface. |
8m-4m 4m-0m |
GRP4ST5D |
6 |
50º 20.199 N |
12:38 |
10.2m/9m |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
GRP4ST6D |
7 |
50º 20.130 N |
12:45 |
14.5m/13m |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
GRP4ST7D |
8 |
50º 20.056 N |
13:15 |
15.2m/12m |
3.5m |
1@11.5m, 1@8m, 1@Surface. |
10m-6m |
GRP4ST8D |
9 |
50º 21.406 N |
13:45 |
14m/13m |
2.75m |
N/A |
N/A |
GRP4ST9D |
10 |
50º 20.885 N |
14:19 |
10m/9m |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
GRP4ST10D |
11 |
50º 20.294 N |
14:38 |
15m/13.8m |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
GRP4ST11D GRP4ST11U |
Table 5 - Table containing results from zooplankton analysis from samples taken
on the Terschelling cruse. All in individuals per m3
Back to Offshore Biological Analysis
Appendix 4 (Small Boats)
4.2.1 Tidal Information
06/07/04 - High Water - 08:47 GMT Low Water -
14:49 GMT 2
days after spring tides.
Back to Small Boat Work
4.2.2 Position and Sampling Data
Station | Position | Time (GMT) | Salinity | Depth (m) | Secchi Depth (m) | pH | Vertical profile |
1 | 50º 29.543 N 04º 12.411 W |
09:54 | 4.68 | 0.24 | 7.99 | no | |
2 | 50º 29.874 N 04º 13.072 W |
09:54 | 7.35 | 4.2 | 0.36 | 7.38 | yes |
3 | 50º 29.543 N 04º 13.281 W |
10:24 | 8.63 | 0.17 | 8.03 | no | |
4 | 50º 29.335 N 04º 13.432 W |
10:10 | 10.36 | 5.7 | 0.34 | 7.42 | yes |
5 | 50º 28.771 N 04º 13.063 W |
10:42 | 11.9 | 0.32 | 8.10 | yes | |
6 | 50º 28.649 N 04º 13.049 W |
10:24 | 14.53 | 3.9 | 0.43 | 7.95 | yes |
7 | 50º 28.119 N 04º 14.060W |
11:00 | 16.8 | 0.42 | 8.10 | yes | |
8 | 50º 27.896N 04º 14.328W |
10:44 | 18.93 | 4.8 | 0.55 | 7.56 | yes |
9 | 50º 27.318N 04º 13.786W |
11:20 | 20.84 | 0.42 | 8.12 | no | |
10 | 50º 27.450 N 04º 13.589 W |
11.03 | 22.03 | 5.3 | N/A | 7.62 | yes |