PIMMs

Polar Ice Motion Monitors



Additional local (SOC) support for ARCICE was successfully sought. We were awarded 50K pounds to design and build a new type of cheap expendable surface-following ice-capable drifter with ORBCOMM communications, GPS and SST/SAT sensors. These floats are called PIMMs - Polar Ice Motion Monitors. Test floats were trialed on the James Clark Ross 1999 summer cruise - Cats-Miaow, and the full set were deployed from the Jan Mayen 2000 winter cruise, SCORESBY.


PIMMs Photos




Background and Objectives:

One of the major aims of ARCICE is to increase the understanding of variations in Arctic ice cover. This is of direct relevance when considering European Climate and controls on the Oceanic Thermohaline Circulation. This means that one important role of ARCICE is to look at the question of ice motion in the Odden. Surface following floats such as PIMMs could give us a novel method of tracking such ice motion.


Float Specifics:

Technical proposal with diagram


Hull design:
The main considerations were for the float to be surface following - ie of similar profile to ice pancakes; strong - to withstand surface ice conditions; stable - to rise rather than sink if squeezed by ice. This last point uses the same idea as for Nansen's Fram all be it on a smaller scale.
Communications:
Orbcomm satellite communications were used to allow buoys to transmit position, air and sea temperature to SOC in the form of an email. ORBCOMM is a commercial provider of global low-Earth orbit satellite data communication services. The system uses LEO satellites instead of terrestrial fixed site relay repeaters. This provides worldwide geographic coverage and allows two-way packets to be sent and recieved - ie e-mail. The PIMMs floats communicate with the satellites via a data communicator (microprocessor based VHF transceiver) with inbuilt GPS to establish position.
Sensors:
Platinum resistance thermometers were used for the measurement of air and sea temperature. Air temperature measurements could be made over a range of -20 to +20 degrees C. Sea temperature measurements were constrained to a range of -2 to +10 degrees C, for greater accuracy.


Trials on Cats-Miaow:

Test deployments of PIMMs were made in polar conditions during the summer of 1999 from the James Clark Ross. The aims were to determine the success of the satellite data communicator; air and sea temperature sensors; and the hull design (drift performance and suvival in extreme ice conditions). It was also necessary to investigate the operation of the instrumentation and batteries at low temperatures.

The test buoys were deployed on an opportunistic basis in the marginal ice zone in various ice conditions. On-board stowage became a trade off between finding a position with clear sky view to maximise the number of good satellite passes and position for ease of deployment. A total of 28 hours of deployment were made in a mixture of open water; open ice, small flows; ice edge in thick Brash; ice.

Hull design:
The buoys behaved well in the ice. There was a tendency to drift off relative to the ice flow when in open water, but this relative drifting stopped when the buoy was in ice or brash. As hoped the hull design was successful in that the buoy popped out or was lifted up, rather than pushed under, when caught in ice or squeezed by large floes.
Communications:
As the ship moved further north the buoys were only in range of near polar orbiting satellites. This limited the number of satellite passes seen - typically 3 to 4 good passes per day.


Deployments on SCORESBY:

A full set of PIMMs deployments were made during winter 2000 from the Jan Mayen.

Deployments:
10 deployments were made using PIMMs with two different makes of satellite communicator (Stellar and Panasonic). The absence of the Odden ice tongue meant that deployments were made either on ice floes in the East Greenland Current, or with a drogue in the open ocean.
Communications:
Of the 10 apparently successful deployments, only 5 floats made successful satellited communications. Two communicators were used. The Stellar had a more sophisticated interface allowing multiple records to be assembled in one message - reducing the total number of messages to be sent. In contrast the Panasonic had less buffer storage capacity and produced more messages, however it was both lower powered and could comunicate with more satellites thus allowing more messages to be sent per day. On initial consideration, perhaps the Panasonic communicator was more successful.

Orby1Deployed in open water; daylight; 10m drogueStellar communicatorNo communication
Orby2Deployed in open water in large seas; dark; 20m drogueStellar communicatorNo communication
Orby3Deployed in open water in calm seas; 20m drogueStellar communicatorNo communication
Orby4Deployed on iceStellar communicationNo communication
Orby5Deployed on icePanasonic communicatorNo communication
Orby6Deployed on ice floe (10-15m diameter)Panasonic communicatorSuccessful communication
Orby7Deployed in open water in large seas; dark; 20m droguePanasonic communicatorSuccessful communication
Orby8Deployed large floes (30m diameter) in pack icePanasonic communicationSuccessful communication
Orby9Deployed in brash ice between large floesPanasonic communicatorSuccessful communication
Orby10Deployed on ice floe (10-15m diameter)Panasonic communicatorSucessful communication




PIMMs tracks


Poster

PIMMs on Ice: A new type of float - Pancake Ice Motion Monitors. (pdf 671K)





Back to ARCICE home page